IMPLICATION OF PLANNING, HOUSING AND RURAL AREA IN NIGERIA
Abstract
The provision of adequate housing
to the citizenry has been a major challenge to governments in both developed
and developing nations of the world. Housing is combination of characteristics
for the purpose of providing a unique home within a given neighbourhood, thus,
it is an array of economic, social and psychological phenomenon. This paper
examines the development of housing units in a rural area in Nigeria and the
provision of infrastructures with a view to ascertaining the sustainability of
the housing environment. The study
revealed that for housing development to be sustainable, basic infrastructures
such as electricity, water supply and waste disposal system had to be put in
place. Considering the different models against which to measure the
sustainability of the housing environment, there is still a lot to be achieved
in the study area in the provision of basic infrastructures. Planning for
housing and setting standards for the regulation of building construction is a
task that seems to overwhelm the relevant government authorities in Nigeria and
other parts of the developing world. This paper therefore examines the
implication of planning, housing and rural areas in Nigeria. It also appraises
their activities so far in the area of implementation, their challenges and
lastly, makes recommendation for improvement.
Keywords Planning, Housing and rural development.
Introduction
The state of housing available to
the people in any nation is a fairly accurate reflection of the quality of life
in that country. It is a very important facet of the national economy and an
important element for increasing productivity and domestic capital formation. It
provides employment and fosters desirable social attitudes. Also housing confers
honour and social dignity on the owners. Housing units like other urban projects
constitute a reduction in the natural environment and the energy consumption contributes
certain percentage to the depletion of the ozone layer. This paper examines the
sustainability of housing development in a residential estate by comparing some
codes for measuring sustainable homes. It provides an overview of the situation
in Nigeria in terms of provision of housing and infrastructures by individual,
communal and governmental participation. The paper encapsulates the need for
housing infrastructure in a rural area in order to ensure the sustainability of
the housing environment.
In terms of
quantitative housing in Nigeria, the number of existing housing units including
those being built throughout the length and breadth of the federation are not
at par with the current demand (Aluko, 2007). The unmet need of housing among
the generality of Nigerians, particularly among those at the lowest rung of the
economic ladder, has been a recurring problem in our National life. Since every
society is faced with the problems of providing habitation in sufficient
quantity, and obtaining the kind and quality desired, at prices that
individuals and families can afford. With the inability of the inhabitants to
afford the financial cost of the housing needs, the next hope lies with the
public authorities for the provision of public especially housing for the low
income groups. Hence, the government’s concerns to sustain and assist the low
income and middle income households, to live in adequate housing by making it
possible for them to build or purchase houses of their own. About twelve years
ago, the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing projected that by the year 2000,
eight million units of houses would be needed before housing could be provided
for all. This amounted to five million
1
housing units in the urban areas
and three million units in the rural areas. This projection would have
doubled b now (2011). Even the
parastatals complained that the Federal Government would need about N16
trillion ($103billion) then to provide housing for all citizens at a minimum
housing unit cost of N200,000 ($1,290). And with yearly budget of the country
which was about N200 billion ($1.3 billion) in 1999, it would take 80 years to
raise N16 trillion ($103 billion). This means that it would be close to the end
of the next millennium before the present housing problem could be solved. Now
that a minimum
housing cost is about N1.5 million ($9,700), and with 2011
budget at N4.2 trillion ($27 billion), there is need for about N14 trillion
($90.3billion) for housing alone. With this scenario, the ultimate goal of the
National Housing Policy to ensure that all Nigerians own or have access to
decent accommodation at affordable cost by the year 2,000 A.D. was dashed and
even up till now Therefore concerted efforts are quickly being looked into in
order to reconsider viable policies and strategies that will alleviate the
suffering of the masses. Sustainable plans are being focused on for proper
housing delivery.
Concept of Rural
Development:
Rural Development is part of general development
that embraces a large segment of those in great need in the rural sector.
Hunter (1964) was among the earliest to use the expression Rural Development
which he considered as the "starting point of development"
characterized by subsistence. World Bank in Ekpo and Olaniyi (1995) defined
rural development as a process through which rural poverty is alleviated by
sustained increases in the productivity and incomes of low-income rural
dwellers and households. This definition is defective as it dwelt majorly on
the economic growth, which is just an aspect of development. Taking into
cognizance, the economic growth and social upliftment as aspects of
development, Ijere (1990) regarded rural development, as the process of
increasing the per capita income and the quality of life of the rural dweller
to enable him become prime mover of his own destiny. Obinne in Ogidefa (2010)
perceived rural development to involve creating and widening opportunities for
(rural) individuals to realize full potential through education and share in
decision and action which affect their lives. He also viewed it as efforts to
increase rural output and create employment opportunities and root out
fundamental (or extreme) cases of poverty, diseases and ignorance.
Therefore, combining all the essential elements of development, Rural
Development can be described as the integrated approach to food production as
well as physical, social and institutional infrastructural provisions with an
ultimate goal of bringing about both quantitative and qualitative changes which
result in improved living standard of the rural population. It therefore,
infers that agricultural production (development) is a component of rural
development as more than two-third of Nigeria's 150 million citizens are
farmers. They live in an estimated 97,000 rural communities. Their lives are
characterized by misery, poverty, morbidity and under-development (Ekpo &
Olaniyi, 1995). Hence, it has been widely recognized that the rural areas and
people are characterized by the following: general poverty trap, low income and
investment ratchet, underutilized and/or unutilized natural resources, rapidly
increasing population, under-employment and/or disguised employment, low
productivity, especially of labour, low and traditional technology, limited enterprise
or
2
entrepreneurship, high level of illiteracy, ignorance,
disease and malnutrition, near absence of social
and physical infrastructures (like all-season roads, potable
water, electricity, good schools, health centres, etc.), and political powerlessness,
gullibility and level of general vulnerability (Lele & Adu-Nyako, 1991: 1 –
29).Rural development has scope that is broad and elastic, and it depends on
the interaction of many forces such as the objectives of the programme, the
availability of resources for planning and implementation, etc. In developing
countries, such as Nigeria, rural development projects will include
agricultural set-up projects, rural water supply projects, rural
electrification projects, rural feeder-road and maintenance projects, rural
health and disease control projects, rural education and Adult education
campaign, rural telecommunication system, and rural industrialization. Based on
the scope of rural development (as the improvement of the total welfare of the
rural low-income people),
the following objectives of rural development evolved:
(i)To have greater commitment of the resources to the rural
areas in terms of budgeting allocation and
actual expenditure.
(ii)To ensure popular participation of the rural people in
the identification of priorities, planning of programmes as well as their
implementation.
(iii)To lay greater emphasis on the use of total resources
and promotion of local skills.
(iv)To expand and improve on rural infrastructure such as
roads, markets stalls, electricity, water and storage facilities.
(v)To maintain political and social stability
(vi)To create rural employment opportunities
(vii)To increase commodity out-put and production and
subsequently increase food and food supply as well as rural farm incomes
From the objectives of the rural development in Nigeria,
Ijere (1990) postulated that the underlying principles of rural development are
as follows:
(i.) The leaders and policy-makers should be committed to
the philosophy of rural development for the improvement of the rural sector.
(ii.) There should be total community involvement in rural
development. To ensure this, rural development organizers should delegate
powers to local leaders at all levels of the population who should account for
the exercise of that power. Also, a more suitable community participation
approach using the people's institutions and leaders is imperative.
(iii) Incentives and motivation should be built into the
rural development system. These could be in form of citations, honourable
mentions, honorary titles and prizes, competition between villages, towns and
local government areas, organizing rural development day to select the best
farmers, cleanest communities, accident-free communities, etc.
3
(iv.) All aspects of the peoples life should be affected by
the rural development schemes to allow for even development.
(v). A core of local leadership should be built-up to
sustain the rural development effort. There should be a standing development
planning committee in every community from which such persons can be mobilized.
(vi.) There should be development of appropriate skills
(human capital development) as well as implementation capacity to sustain new
technologies and improvement of social welfare.
(vii.) Rural development programmes should utilize the
cultural values and practices of the people. It makes the scheme understandable
and meaningful. Indigenous institutions such as age grades; youth
organizations, clubs and town unions should be used in reaching the people and
in mobilizing latent energies.
Concept of Planning :
Planning is a word of
many meanings. To some, it means blueprint for the future; to others, it means
government’s responsibility to take whatever action necessary to ensure that
the economic system operates efficiently. To a house-wife, planning may be
conceived as means of managing her feeding budget within the allowance
allocated to her by the husband and to a class teacher, planning relates to the
preparation in advance of his/her lecture. One common meaning of planning is
that it is concerned with deliberately achieving some objectives (which may be
individual or corporate) and it proceeds by evolving strategies and actions
arranged in a prioritised order or sequence.
In view of these
observations, planning generally involves thinking ahead and making advance
arrangements to achieve particular objectives. Planning embraces the simple
process of determining appropriate future action through a sequence of CHOICES.
There is no form one can talk of planning without bringing out the issue of
choice. In the same vein, Oyesiku (2002) defines planning as the art and
science of making choices among options in the present and future development
and securing their implications subject to allocation of necessary resources.
Planning then becomes
an idea that transcends the entire human endeavour. It can be applied to
virtually all human activities, right from the level of individual, the family
or the neighbourhood’ to that of the town, district or the society. The
application of the term ‘’planning’’ to the management of our environment is
often times traditionally referred to as ‘Town Planning’. Town planning is the
art and science of ordering the use of land and the character and siting of
buildings and communication routes so as to secure maximum practicable degree
of economy, convenience and beauty (Keebles, 1969).
In the same
vein, town planning is concerned with the provision of the right site at the
right time in the right place for the right people (i.e. users). From all
indications, the objective of town planning essentially is to create a pleasant
and healthy environment for man.
4
Policy Aims
Introduction
In supporting
housing development patterns in rural areas that are sustainable, policies and
practices of planning authorities should seek to:
(1) Ensure
that the needs of rural communities are identified in the development plan
process and that policies are put in place to ensure that the type and scale of
residential and other development in rural areas, at appropriate locations,
necessary to sustain rural communities is
accommodated,
(2) Manage
pressure for overspill development from urban areas in the rural areas closest
to the main cities and towns such as the gateways, hubs, and other large towns.
An important task in addressing these aims is to identify the scale and
distribution of the future housing needs of rural communities and to set out
policies in the development plan. Planning authorities should aim, therefore,
to support the following overarching policy objectives in their policies,
practices and actions:
• The importance of encouraging development needed to
sustain and
renew established rural communities in both
smaller rural
towns and villages and wider countryside
areas,
• The need to ensure that the planning system guides residential
and other
development to the right locations in rural areas
in the
interest of protecting natural and man-made assets in
those areas,
and
• The need to analyse the different types of economic, social
and physical
circumstances of different types of rural areas
and to tailor
planning policies to respond to these differing
local
circumstances.
Sustaining
and Renewing Established Rural Communities
Planning
authorities should monitor development, population, economic and other trends
in rural areas closely and ensure that the planning system is responding. For
example:
(1)
Significant population decline in rural areas should trigger the need for
development plan and local authority investment policies aimed at encouraging
housing development at
appropriate
identified locations in parallel with promoting development and economic
activity in smaller villages and towns.
(2) Very
significant population increases in rural areas adjoining towns and cities in
contrast with population stability or decline within these urban areas suggests
the need to examine
the reasons
why the population of the town or city is not growing, how any barriers to
development might be overcome and appropriate supportive policies for rural
areas
adjoining
urban areas. The key message in this regard is that the planning system must
take a more
analytically based and plan led approach.
Strengthening
Rural Villages and Towns
Difficulties
in securing affordable and high quality housing in cities, towns and villages
are frequently cited as the reason why many people seek to build houses in the
open countryside.
Planning
authorities need to ensure that cities, towns and villages offer attractive and
affordable housing options to meet the housing needs of urban communities and persons
wishing to live in urban areas. This will assist in mitigating excessive levels
of pressure for urban generated development in rural areas, especially those closest
to the environs of cities and towns. It will also enhance the availability and
affordability of sites and housing in rural areas to meet the housing needs of
the established rural community. Arrange of different housing options in small
5
towns,
villages and in more rural areas is required to meet the differing needs of the
people who
live in those communities. Local government area have a variety of measures
available to them to secure the ongoing development, renewal and improvement of
towns and villages. These measures include the incorporation of appropriate
policies in the development plan, derelict sites legislation and serviced land
initiatives relating to water service
and roads
related infrastructure. Development of individual serviced sites or housing
schemes of
appropriate
scale and character, within, or in the vicinity of small rural towns and
villages can be encouraged using these mechanisms. Using the development plan
and local plan processes, planning authorities should therefore make every
effort to harness all of these measures to ensure that sufficient high quality,
well located and affordable development can take place. Further suggestions in
this regard will be contained in forthcoming Guidelines on Development Plans.
Guiding
Development
The planning
system seeks to encourage and support appropriate development at the most
suitable locations. Objective policies and unambiguous criteria will both aid
persons preparing applications for permission to carry out development and
build wider public
support for
the planning system. For example, looking to the area of natural and cultural
heritage
and natural
resources, rural areas contain many features of interest and value that are key
elements of that heritage and which are also a key part of a healthy economy
and vibrant society. Natural features include habitats, environmentally
sensitive areas,
important scenic
landscapes of national and international repute, ground and surface waters, mineral
and aggregate reserves. Features and assets created by human activity include
aspects of heritage such as archaeology, inland waterways and protected
structures. Siting new development in rural areas in a way that protects the integrity
of these natural and man-made features is an essential part of sustainable
development. The development plan has a key
role to play
in identifying features and providing helpful advice. Such advice could include
checklists to assist applicants in choosing the most appropriate sites and positions
within sites. Such advice should also indicate the measures that could be
adopted to minimise the impact of the proposed development.
Tailoring Planning Policies to Local
Circumstances
Sites in
different rural areas or indeed different sites in the same area can differ
markedly as regards suitability for development due to a range of different
considerations, including access and drainage. The planning and development
issues inherent in considering an application for a dwelling in a rural area
close to, for example, the outskirts of Dublin, or a major county town or
on the
western seaboard all differ considerably. Within a county or part of a county,
local development trends, road access issues or drainage matters can create varying
considerations relating to proper planning and sustainable development.
Taking
account of the above, the outcome of different planning applications which may
seem largely similar will not always be the same. However, the planning system
must aim for consistency and transparency in the application and interpretation
of development plan policy criteria in the assessment of all applications.
Rural Development/ Planning Approaches
: The overall aim of rural planning efforts is geared towards the improvement
of the lives of the rural population. However, several approaches aimed at
arresting the ugly under-development situation in rural areas have been put
forward. According to Ijere (1990: 52 – 54), they include the following:
6
1. Growth Pole Centre Model: This model is also known as
"Growth Point Model". The model involves the development of a few
strategic towns, communities and industries likely to activate other sectors.
The model focuses attention on the development of few towns leading to the
neglect of the rural areas.
2. The "Big Push" Policy: This approach is similar
to the growth pole centre model except that it is more concentrated. It takes a
few sub-sectors and expends most of the resources on them in the hope that in
the long run, their multiplier effect will salvage the whole economy. The flaw
in this model is that "in the long run" is not a specific period.
3. The Selective Approach: This model/approach involves the
selection of certain sectors for development based on economic, political,
social or religious grounds, which may not necessarily be related or
inter-connected.
4. The Protectionist Approach: In this approach, the
government carries out the development process on behalf of the people
believing that it knows everything and that the people are not yet ripe to
participate, in the management of their own affairs.
5. The Top-down Approach: It is also called the Top-bottom
approach. It is a strategy based on passing down to the poor certain policies
and directives from the governing bureaucracy. This type of rural development
approach requires force to maintain and sustain it.
6. The Decentralized Territorial Approach: This approach
centres on the dispersal of benefits to the rural area. It has minimum linkage
with the city but with settlements of various sizes to act as service and
market centres. The defect in this approach is the undue fear of towns being
exploitative and parasitic, and the consideration that size alone could
determine the performance of a settlement.
Housing
Delivery in Nigeria
When we examine the housing delivery system, we
tried to explain the total number of building constructions that is made
available especially to the people and rental sub sector. Certificates of
occupancy are collected on land to be developed for building purposes. The
assumption is that the number of housing development can be estimated from the
legal document. When we compare the figures of the buildings that are finally
ratified and collected with number of submissions for processing and approved,
we found out that they are very low. Which indicates that rate of building
construction is very low compared with expected
demand from households. The minister for works and housing admitted when he
said “the ministry is aware of the huge housing problems facing the people”
(The Liberation, May 25, 2011, p.4). The ministry has requested for N5.5
trillion ($3.6 billion) from the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN) and
National Housing Fund (NHF) to build 20 million housing units across the
country. So with millions of housing units needed in Lagos alone, hardly can
the State boast of 5000 housing supply annually.
Solution to some planning dilemma
(i) Rural
Infrastructure Planning and Development
(ii) Urban Management
(iii) Planning
Administration.
7
I. Rural Infrastructure Planning and
Development:
In
spite of the abundant resources in the rural areas in Nigeria, the areas for
many years have not received the deserved attention in terms of policy
formulation and implementation. This is an indication that the rural areas
which currently accommodate over 60 percent of the Nigerian population had long
been neglected (Olujimi 1988, 2003). However, the long neglect of the rural
areas in Nigeria has always been associated with high poverty rate and
under-development. It has also resulted in the classification of the zones as
areas with high propensity for outmigration (Udo, 1975). Olujimi (1996) has
also established the long neglect of the rural areas which has equally resulted
in non-availability of rural infrastructure in the areas. The lack of rural
infrastructure has been the bane of rural problem. Often times, governments on
their own part have been hiding under the pretext that the scattered
distribution pattern and the small population in the villages have not made the
provision of rural infrastructure in villages a viable project.
II Rural Dwellers and
Health
Governments and
International organisations have long recognised the need to improve the health
of the poor. In the 1970s, the World Health Organisation (WHO) led global
effort to achieve ‘Health for all’ by the year 2000. More than 40 years later
however, the goal remains elusive. The popular parlance that ‘health is wealth’
is based on the understanding that good health is a pre-condition for socio-
political and
economic development. Unfortunately, formal health services are simply unable
to reach significant fraction of the people in most developing countries that
are yearning for development of which Nigeria is one and in which rural
dwellers are most affected.
II. Urban Management
The increasing
population coupled with the depressed economic situation in Nigeria has
continued to make intra-and inter-city movement of people and goods to rely
heavily on public transport which is largely in the hands of the private
sector. The growing importance of inter-city travels through public transport
is associated with attendant problems of delays, insecurity of passenger’s
goods, and lack of convenience for passenger’s comfort at motor parks; which
are the points of origin and destination of travels. The intra-city travels
cannot be spared from all these problems. However, they are predominantly
characterised by frequent traffic hold-ups as a result of picking and dropping
of passengers and goods at unauthorised points coupled with the activities of
rival motor transport unions.
Olujimi (2000h)
examined the locations and management of motor parks in Akure. Sixteen (16)
motor parks that were strictly used by commercial vehicles were identified, out
of which 10 were inter-town motor parks and only 5 of the motor parks were
operated at authorised locations. The remaining 5 motor parks were operated at
unauthorised locations, which were either privately leased or forcefully
occupied and converted to motor parks by the National Union of Roads Transport
Workers (NURTW) and Road Transport Employers Association of Nigeria (RTEAN).
The remaining 6 motor parks were intra-city motor parks and they were operating
at unauthorised locations.
The statutory role to
grant approval for any type of physical development falls on the Town Planning
Authority, under whose jurisdiction the location of such development is sited.
The local government council authority never sought approval for any of the
motor parks constructed at the authorised locations. Each of the motor parks
can best be described as sheds, without any functional supporting
infrastructure. The management of the motor parks was ceded to the NURTW, which
in turn remits ‘peanut’ (i.e. ridiculously low amount of money) to the coffer
of the local government council.
The unregulated sales
of alcohol in all the motor parks, even throughout the south west (Oyedepo,
8
1981) is inimical to
the safety of lives and properties of the travellers and the drivers. The study
finally called on the local government council authority to be more proactive
in the management and location of motor parks with a view to ensure that all
motor parks are located and constructed in accordance with planning laws and
regulations; rather than using planning to intimidate opposing faction of
transport unions while the sales of Union tickets on the carriage ways should
be stopped by the government. In addition, the management of the motor parks
must be taken away from the transport unions.
In Nigeria, the local
government is the nearest to the grass root and obviously nearest to the
problems of the people living in the urban centres than the other two tiers of
government (i.e. Federal and State governments) in the Federation. The
statutory functions of the local government as contained in the fourth schedule
of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution made the local government responsible for the
provision and maintenance of many of the social services which are most in
demand by the urban population. The question bothering the minds of most
physical planners in Nigeria is how well has the local government been able to
manage the urban problems despite the opportunities available to the organ?
Olujimi (2000b,
2000c) examined the roles of the local government in the management of Nigerian
towns and cities. The study among others identified the political incursion of
the state governments into the statutory functions and finances of the local
governments which had virtually rendered the local
government idle and
irrelevant in the management of Nigerian towns. The statutory allocation to the
local government from the federation account often times are politically hijacked
and spent by the state. It has thus, left the local government in a poor
financial situation and inability to invest in the equipment and viable
ventures that can further enhance their performance in city management.
The study also
identified the non-establishment of Town Planning Authorities (TPAs) at the
local government areas in most states of the federation; as a gross violation
of the Urban and Regional Planning law. The non-establishment of TPAs has made
the control of physical development ineffective. Olujimi (2000a) called for the
statutory liberation of the local government from the ‘political imprisonment’
of the state government. This would ensure that local government authority has
sufficient funds for further investment in manpower, recruitment and retaining
of capable hands that could turn around the local government in the effective
management of our towns and cities.
III. Planning Administration
Town Planners need ‘political will’ to get
planning proposals implemented. Therefore, Town Planners are involved in what
is referred to as ‘’politics of planning’’ which is strictly in the domain of
planning administration. Olujimi (1993) evaluated planning administration in
Nigeria with a focus on the then Ondo State. The findings of the study among
others identified shortage of physical planning staff, unhealthy rivalry
between physical planning agencies, low level of equipment and out-dated
planning laws. The study suggested among others the need to take planning to
the doorsteps of the people at the grassroots by allocating planning
responsibilities to the local government and embarking on aggressive
enlightenment among stakeholders to make physical planning acceptable. After
six (6) years, the planning law in the state was put in place (ODSG, Edit No. 3
of 1999) but to-date major provisions of the law are yet to be implemented and
it is under review.
One cannot but
commend the effort of the present administration in Ondo State for the
establishment
9
of Ministry of
Physical Planning and Urban Development. At the inception of the Ministry, a
stakeholders’ forum was convened and suggestions on the modalities for the
administration of physical planning in the state were made (Olujimi, 2009b).
The on-going removal of illegal structures in parts of Akure, the state capital
is a bold step taken by the present administration. Ekiti State has equally
followed suit and Edo State is currently putting the modalities in place while
Akwa Ibom State has announced its intension and Lagos State took the lead years
back and the impact on the economy, social and physical outlook of the state
are available for people to see.
Conclusion and Recommendations
It is observed that
Planning Authorities alone cannot enforce all the planning ordinances and laws
that are to be implemented to achieve a desirable environment in rural area. It
is therefore important for planning authorities to seek for team work and
collaboration with other relevant fields in order to enhance capacity building
to improve functionality in planning and housing in rural areas.
Planners
and planning agencies often dabbles and double up into filling the gap other
professions such as transportation and landscape design making the task almost
burdensome or doing thing haphazardly. In the light of this planning
Authorities should involve and employ other land related professionals
Planning
Authorities should also have members of the Executive arm of government working
with monitoring sections of the planning Agencies that will make quick arrest
of environmental law offences
examples of which are
the sanitary inspector and Special Forces that kick against in indiscipline.
Planning
Agencies should also be loyal to duty avoiding kick whatever form it may
appear.
Comments
Post a Comment